![]() (2002) Principal Component Analysis (2nd ed). (2001), Computing and evaluating factor scores. Gottfried Helms compared these two rotations with those produced by SPSS and found identical values if using the appropriate options. Furthermore, note that Varimax by default does not apply the Kaiser normalization, but varimax does. ![]() This can be enhanced by specifying eps=1e-14 in the call to principal if using varimax rotation. The rotation matrix used to produce the rotated component loadings.īy default, the accuracy of the varimax rotation function seems to be less than the Varimax function. The correlations of the component score estimates with the components, if they were to be found and unit weights were used. (From Grice, 2001) For components, these are of course 1.0. The multiple R square between the factors and factor score estimates, if they were to be found. The beta weights to find the principal components from the data If scores=TRUE, then estimates of the factor scores are reported If oblique rotations (using oblimin from the GPArotation package) are requested, what is the interfactor correlation. If n.obs > 0, then what is the probability of observing a chisquare this large or larger? Using the formula from factanal:Ĭhi^2 = (n.obs - 1 - (2 * p + 5)/6 - (2 * factors)/3)) * f If the number of observations is specified or found, this is a chi square based upon the objective function, f. Because components do not minimize the off diagonal, this fit will be not as good as for factor analysis. ![]() R: Principal components analysis (PCA) principal R) - log(|(FF'+U2)^-1 R|) - n.items. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |